An Exploratory Study on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Value Profiles and Value Conflicts of Dutch and Spanish Academic Professionals

Authors

  • Gjalt de Graaf University Amsterdam, Bestuurswetenschap en Politicologie, Hoofdgebouw VU
  • Anne-Marie Reynaers Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Departamento de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Facultad de Derecho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60583/gypp.v32i1.2152

Keywords:

value conflicts, value profiles, administrative traditions, professionalism, international comparison

Abstract

The value profiles of public sector workers and the value conflicts they face are dependent on organizational characteristics, it has been suggested. However, little is known about the influence of administrative traditions on these profiles and conflicts in profes sional settings. Whereas some suggest administrative traditions might be influential, others maintain that professional characteristics determine which values are considered important and which value conflicts are experienced. This exploratory study compares Dutch and Spanish academic teachers in order to empirically assess the extent of any variation in the value profiles and value conflicts of professionals working in the same sector but in countries with different state traditions. The analysis of Q methodological data and interview data (N = 63) reveals similarities as well as differences and suggests that it is an interplay between professional characteristics and a country’s administrative tradition that determines which values are considered to be important and which conflicts are experienced.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gjalt de Graaf, University Amsterdam, Bestuurswetenschap en Politicologie, Hoofdgebouw VU

Gjalt de Graaf (holandés) es catedrático de la VU Universidad Ámsterdam (Países Bajos), en el Departamento de Ciencia Política y Administración Pública. Su investigación se centra en la calidad (y normatividad) de la gobernanza pública, especialmente los valores públicos en conflicto, la integridad de la gobernanza en general y de la educación académica en particular, la influencia de las redes sociales en la gobernanza pública y la denuncia de irregularidades. Ha publicado en revistas de impacto como Public Administration, The American Review of Public Administration y Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, entre otras.

Anne-Marie Reynaers, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Departamento de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Facultad de Derecho

Anne-Marie Reynaers (holandesa) es profesora asociada (acreditada como profesora titular desde 2019) de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (España), en el Departamento de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales. Ha sido profesora e investigadora en la Universidad de Ámsterdam y en la VU Universidad de Ámsterdam. Es máster de Investigación de Ciencias de la Administración y de la Organización (Universidad de Utrecht) y doctora en Ciencias de la Administración (VU Universidad de Ámsterdam). Su trabajo sobre valores públicos, consorcios públicos-privados y gestión pública ha sido publicado en revistas internacionales de impacto como Public Administration Review, Regulation & Governance y Public Administration, entre otras.

References

Alba, C.R. y C. Navarro (2011), “Administrative Tradition and Reforms in Spain: Adaptation versus Innovation”, Public Administration, 89(3), pp. 783-800.

Bach, T. y E. Huber (2012), “Comparing Agencification in Continental Countries”, en K. Verhoest, S. Van Thiel, G. Bouckaert, P. Lægreid (eds.), Government Agencies, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 203-210.

Benson, J.K. (1973), “The Analysis of Bureaucratic-professional Conflict: Functional versus Dialectical Approaches”, The Sociological Quarterly, 14(3), pp. 376-394.

Bevir, M. (2012), Governance: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, Oxfrod University Press.

Bleiklie, I. y S. Michelsen (2013), “Comparing HE policies in Europe: Structures and Reform Outputs in Eight Countries”, Higher Education, 65(1), pp. 113-133.

Brouwer, M. (1999), “Q is Accounting for Tastes”, Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), pp. 35-39.

Brown, S. (1980), Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q-methodology in Political Science, New Haven y Londres, Yale University Press.

Brown, S. (1993), “A Primer on Q-methodology”, Operant Subjectivity, 16(3-4), pp. 91-138.

Clark, B. (1983), The Higher Education System, Berkeley, University of Califormia Press.

De Boer, H.F., J. Enders y U. Schimank (2008), “Comparing Higher Education Governance Systems in four European Countries”, en N.C. Soguel y P. Jaccard (eds.), Governance and Performance of Education Systems, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 35-54.

De Graaf, G. (2011), “The Loyalties of Top Public Administrators”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), pp. 285-306.

De Graaf, G. (2015), “The Bright Future of Value Pluralism in Public Administration”, Administration and Society, 47(9), pp. 1094-1102, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009539971559834.

De Graaf, G. (2016), Conflicterende Waarden in Academia, Ámsterdam, Inaugural Lecture Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

De Graaf, G. (2021), “Value Conflicts in Academic Teaching”, Teaching Public Administration, 39(1), pp. 107-124.

De Graaf, G. y A. Meijer (2019), “Social Media and Value Conflicts: An Explorative Study of the Dutch Police”, Public Administration Review, 79(1), pp. 82-92, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12914.

De Graaf, G., L. Huberts y R. Smulders (2016), “Coping with Public Value Conflicts”, Administration & Society, 48(9), pp. 1101-1127, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714532273.

De Graaf, G. y H. Paanakker (2015), “Good Governance: Performance Values and Procedural Values in Conflict”, American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), pp. 635-652, DOI: 10.1177/0275074014529361.

De Graaf, G. y J. Van Exel (2009), “Using Q-methodology in Administrative Ethics”, Public Integrity, 11(1), pp. 63-78.

De Graaf, G. y Z. Van der Wal (2017), “Without Blinders: Public Values Scholarship in Political Science, Economics, and Law: Content and Contribution to Public Administration”, Public Integrity, 19(3), pp. 196-218.

De Graaf, G., L. Huberts y R. Smulders (2014), “Coping with Public Value Conflicts”, Administration & Society, 48(9), pp. 1101-1127, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714532273.

De Vries, Michiel S. (2002), “Can You Afford Honesty?: A Comparative Analysis of Ethos and Ethics in Local Government”, Administration & Society, 34(3), pp. 309-334.

Díez, S.P. (2012), “La reforma del Estado durante el periodo democrático”, en J.A. Olmeda, S. Díez, y C. Colino (coords.), Las administraciones públicas en España, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, pp. 95-122.

Dobbins, M., C. Knill y E.M. Vögtle (2011), “An Analytical Framework for the Crosscountry Comparison of Higher Education Governance”, Higher Education, 62(5), pp. 665-683.

Eisenhardt, K. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research”, Academy of Management Review,14(4), pp. 532-550.

Freidson, E. (2001), Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

George, A.L. y A. Bennett (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Hall, R.H. (1968), “Professionalization and Bureaucratization”, American Sociological Review, 33, pp. 92-104.

Herriott, R.E. y W.A. Firestone (1983), “Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability”, Educational Researcher, 12, pp. 14-19.

Kickert, W. (2011), “Distinctiveness of Administrative Reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain: Common Characteristics of Context, Administrations and Reforms”, Public Administration, 89(3), pp. 801-818.

Knill, C. (1998), “European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions”, Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), pp. 1-28.

Kuhlmann, S. y H. Wollmann (2019), Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Loughlin, J. y B.G. Peters (1997), “State Traditions, Administrative Reform and Regionalization”, en M. Keating y J. Loughlin (eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism, Londres, Cass, pp. 41-62.

Macaulay, M. (2018), “Ethics and Integrity”, en E. Ongaro y S. Van Thiel (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration in Europe, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 279-289.

Nederhand, J., E.H. Klijn, M. van der Steen y M. van Twist (2018), “The Governance of Self-organization: Which Governance Strategy do Policy Officials and Citizens Prefer?”, Policy Sciences, 52, pp. 233-253.

Noordegraaf, M. (2015), “Hybrid Professionalism and Beyond: (New) Forms of Public Professionalism in Changing Organizational and Societal Contexts”, Journal of Professions and Organization, 2, pp. 2187-2206.

Olsen, J. (2007), “The Institutional Dynamics of the European University”, en M. Peter y O. Johan (eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration, Dordrecht, Springer.

Ongaro, E. (2009), Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Painter, M. y B.G. Peters (2010), “Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective: Families, Groups and Hybrids”, en M. Painter y B.G. Peters (eds.), Tradition and Public Administration, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19-30.

Parrado, S. y A. Reynaers (2017), Valores públicos y sector privado: ¿Una cuestión de control o de confianza? Madrid, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.

Parrado, S. y A. Reynaers (2019), “Public-private Partnerships: Procedural over Resultsdriven Accountability”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, DOI: 10.1177/0020852319864161.

Peters, B.G. (2008), “The Napoleonic Tradition”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), pp. 118-132.

Peters, B.G. y J. Pierre (eds.) (2001), Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform, Londres, Routledge.

Pollitt, C. y G. Bouckaert (2004), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, segunda edición, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Pollitt, C. y G. Bouckaert (2017), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-into the Age of Austerity, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Reay, T. y C.R. Hinings (2009), “Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics”, Organization Studies, 30(6), pp. 629-652.

Scott, W.R. (1966), “Professionals in Bureaucracies: Areas of Conflict”, en H. Vollmer y D. Mills (eds.), Professionalization, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, pp. 265-275.

Selden, S.C., G.A. Brewer y J.L. Brudney (1999), “Reconciling Competing Values in Public Administration: Understanding the Administrative Role Concept”, Administration & Society, 31(2), pp. 171-204.

Sorensen, J.E. y T.L. Sorensen (1974), “The Conflict of Professionals in Bureaucratic Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), pp. 98-106.

Twijnstra, A. y G. de Graaf (2013), “Young Loyalties: Loyalty Conceptions and Loyalty Conflicts of Young Dutch and English Public Administrators”, Operant Subjectivity, 36(2), pp. 73-92.

V an der Wal, Z. y L. Yang (2015), “Confucius Meets Weber or ‹Managerialism Takes All?’ Comparing Civil Servant Values in China and the Netherlands”, International Public Management Journal, 18(3), pp. 411-436.

Van Der Wal, Z., G. de Graaf y K. Lasthuizen (2008a), “What’s Valued Most? Similarities and Differences between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private Sector”, Public Administration, 86(2), pp. 465-482, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x.

Van der Wal, Z., G. de Graaf y K. Lasthuizen (2008b), “What’s Valued Most? A Comparative Empirical Study on the Differences and Similarities between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private Sector”, Public Administration, 86(2), pp. 465-482.

van Exel, J. y G. de Graaf (2005), "Q Methodology: A Sneak Preview", en: https://qmethod.org/portfolio/van-exel-and-de-graaf-a-q-methodology-sneak-preview/ [fecha de consulta: 7 de noviembre de 2022].

Van Helden, J. y P.E. Jansen (2003), “New Public Management in Dutch Local Government”, Local Government Studies, 29(2), pp. 68-88.

Watts, S. y P. Stenner (2005), “Doing Q-methodology: Theory, Method and Interpretation”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, pp. 67-91.

Watts, S. y P. Stenner (2012), Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation, Londres, Sage Publications, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251911.

Yin, R.K. (1989), Case Study Research, Newbury Park, Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-24
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    590
  • PDF (Español)
    612
  • XML (Español)
    10

How to Cite

de Graaf, Gjalt, and Anne-Marie Reynaers. 2023. “An Exploratory Study on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Value Profiles and Value Conflicts of Dutch and Spanish Academic Professionals”. Gestión Y Política Pública 32 (1):69-97. https://doi.org/10.60583/gypp.v32i1.2152.

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Gestión y Organización (Management and Organization)

Metrics