Default in Paying Taxes: Intervention with Nudges and Social Standards.

Authors

  • Solon Bevilacqua Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brasil.
  • Edivan do Socorro Fonseca de Miranda Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60583/gypp.v33i1.8191

Keywords:

default, nudges, social norms, entrepreneur, machine learning

Abstract

In this research, a group of charging messages for the payment of taxes was investigated. Altogether 12 variations of billing messages (social norms, simplification, disclosure, previous engagement, reminders and previous choices) were evaluated, and their effectiveness was tested. The messages were transmitted to defaulting microentrepreneurs in four Brazilian states. From a database containing information about defaulting micro entrepreneurs, 250 thousand text messages were sent making charges. The data were obtained from the Secretaria Especial da Micro e Pequena Empresa (Sempe). Tests were used to analyse the difference between means and Logistic Regression was used in sequence. The Random Forest, Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes widgets were used to indicate the robustness of the Machine Learning predictive model. The research findings indicated that the formats “simplification”, “previous choices” and “alert”, employees, did not have an effect in combating default. However, when aligned with social norms, messages in the form of “past options” and “reminders” increase the payment of debts. The widgets used indicated an excellent fit to the machine learning model. The Random Forest tool attested with superiority that the model is robust and suitable for the predictive function. The results of the research provide a contribution to public policies when they present an effective action to reduce defaults in the payment of taxes. The use of messages in the social norm format can be adapted to other situations, constituting a suggestion for future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Solon Bevilacqua, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brasil.

Doctor en Psicología por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Goiás (puc Goiás), vinculado a la Universidad Federal de Goiás, profesor permanente del Programa de Posgrado en Ingeniería de Producción (ppgep) y del Programa de Posgrado Interdisciplinario en Derechos Humanos (ppgidh). Estudiante del Curso Superior de Defensa, Escuela Superior de Defensa, Ministerio de Defensa.

Edivan do Socorro Fonseca de Miranda, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Brasil.

Maestro en Administración Pública por la Universidad Federal de Goiás (ufg), especialista en Gestión Pública (Universidad de Brasilia), tiene doble titulación: en Administración (Universidad Federal de Río de Ja­neiro) y en Derecho (Unisul). Es servidor público y se desempeña como analista de comercio exterior (Carrera en el Ciclo de Gestión Gubernamental del Gobierno Federal de Brasil). Ocupó varios cargos, entre ellos el de coordinador de la Política Nacional de Modernización del Estado (pnme) y el de secretario ejecutivo del Foro Nacional de Modernización del Estado (fnme). También se desempeñó como director del Departamen­to de Apoyo a la Micro y Pequeña Empresa del Ministerio de Industria, Comercio Exterior y Servicios (mdic), habiendo trabajado directamente en la elaboración del Marco Legal para el Reemprendimiento y la Política Nacional de Apoyo y Desarrollo del Puerto de Micro y Pequeñas Empresas de Brasil.

References

Adelman, C. (1993), “Kurt Lewin and the Origins of Action Research”, Educational Action Research, 1(1), pp. 7-24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102.

Afonso, W. (2014), “Would You Like a Receipt with That ? An Information-Sharing Tool for Enhancing Citizen Engagement”, Public Management Bulletin, 8, pp. 1-16.

Aim, J., G.H. McClelland y W.D. Schulze (1992), “Why Do People Pay Their Taxes?”, Journal of Public Economics, 17(48), pp. 21-38, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139026918.007.

Alló, M. y M.L. Loureiro (2017), “The Role of Social Norms on Conservation Programmes in Shellfish Fisheries”, Marine Policy, 84, pp. 134-141, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.008.

Balestrino, A. (2010), “Tax Avoidance and the Endogenous Formation of Social Norms”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(5), pp. 601-609, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.so¬cec.2010.06.003.

Becker, G. (1968), “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach”, Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), pp. 169-217.

Boto Ferreira, M., D. Costa Pinto, M. Maurer Herter, J. Soro, L. Vanneschi, M. Castelli y F. Peres (2020), “Using Artificial Intelligence to Overcome Over-indebtedness and Fight Poverty”, Journal of Business Research, 131, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres. 2020.10.035.

Bovens, J.l. (2009), “The Ethics of Nudge”, en T.Grüne-Yanoff y S.O. Hansson (eds.), Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology, Theory and Decision Library A42 Series, Luxemburgo, Springer Science+Business Media.

Bronchetti, E.T., T. Dee, D. Huffman y E. Magenheim (2011), When a Nudge Isn’t Enough: Defaults and Saving Among Low-Income Tax Filers, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w16887.

Chetty, R. (2015), “Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective",” American Economic Review, 105(5), pp. 1-33, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151108.

Chiu, A.S.F., K.B. Aviso, J. Baquillas y R.R. Tan (2020), “Can Disruptive Events Trigger Transitions Towards Sustainable Consumption?”, Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2020.100001.

Cialdini, R.B. y N.J. Goldstein (2004), “Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity”, Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), pp. 591-621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.

Cullis, J., P. Jones y A. Savoia (2012), “Social Norms and Tax Compliance: Framing the Decision to Pay Tax”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), pp. 159-168, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.12.003.

Curtius, H.C., S.L. Hille, C. Berger, U.J.J. Hahnel y R. Wüstenhagen (2018), “Shotgun or Snowball Approach? Accelerating the Diffusion of Rooftop Solar Photovoltaics through Peer Effects and Social Norms”, Energy Policy, 118, pp. 596-602, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.005.

Del Carpio, L. (2013), “Are the Neighbors Cheating? Evidence from a Social Norm Experiment on Property Taxes in Peru”, Job Market Paper.

Elster, J. (1999), “Social Norms and Economic Theory”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 3(4), pp. 99-117, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00138-4.

Erkut, H., M. Sefton y D. Nosenzo (2014), Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Spectators vs. Stakeholders, CeDEx Discussion Paper Series 2014-16, The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics.

Fuentes García, R. y J. A. Serrano (2019), “El concejo abierto, posibilidad de mayor de¬mocracia y participación ciudadana”, Gestión y Política Pública, XXVIII(2), pp. 441-472, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v28i2.626.

Furedi, F. (2013), Defending Moral Autonomy against an Army of Nudgers, Spiked.

Gino, F. y D. Ariely (2012), “The Dark Side of Creativity: Original Thinkers Can be More Dishonest”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), pp. 445-459, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026406.

Hagman, W., D. Andersson, D. Västfjäll y G. Tinghög (2015), “Public Views on Policies Involving Nudges”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), pp. 439-453, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2.

Hansen, P.G. y A.M. Jespersen (2013), “Nudge and the Manipulation of Choice: A Fra¬mework for the Responsible use of the Nudge Approach to Behaviour Change in Public Policy”, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1), pp. 3-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ s1867299x00002762.

Hauffa, J., T. Lichtenberg y G. Groh, G. (2012), “Rumo a uma caracterização temática das relações sociais baseada na PNL”, presentado en la Conferencia Internacional sobre Informática Social, diciembre, IEEE, pp. 289-294.

Horne, C. y E.H. Kennedy (2017), “The Power of Social Norms for Reducing and Shifting Electricity Use”, Energy Policy, 107, pp. 43-52, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.029.

Huber, R.A., B. Anderson y T. Bernauer (2018), “Can Social Norm Interventions Promote Voluntary pro Environmental Action?”, Environmental Science and Policy, 89, pp. 231-246, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.016.

Jiménez, P. y G.S. Iyer (2016), “Tax Compliance in a Social Setting: The Influence of Social Norms, Trust In Government, and Perceived Fairness on Taxpayer Compliance”, Advances in Accounting, 34, pp. 17-26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.07.001.

Kasznar, I. (2009), “A leitura econômica da violência e segurança”, en F.B. de Oliveira, D.M. Zouain, M.A. Ruediger y V. Riccio (eds.), Desafios da gestão pública de segurança, Río de Janeiro, FGV, pp. 141-164.

Kendall, D. y J. Kessler (2010), “A Taxpayer Receipt”, Third Way, pp. 1-5, DOI: papers2://publication/uuid/E3707D24-6B6A-42E8-9140-092313D11BFD.

León, C., P. Barucca, O. Acero, G. Gage y F. Ortega (2020), “Pattern Recognition of Financial Institutions’ Payment Behavior”, Latin American Journal of Central Banking, 1(1-4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.latcb.2020.100011.

Mazar, N. y D. Ariely (2008), “Dishonesty in Everyday Life and Its Policy Implications”, Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), pp. 633-644.

Onu, D. y L. Oats (2016), “‘Paying Tax is Part of Life’: Social Norms and Social Influence in Tax Communications”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 124, pp. 29-42, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.11.017.

Schultz, P.W., J.M. Nolan, R.B. Cialdini, N.J. Goldstein y V. Griskevicius (2007), “Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms”, Psychological Science, 18(5), pp. 429-434, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.

Sempe (2017), Dados de envio de mensagens de voz para redução da inadimplência, E-SIC- Sistema Eletrônico Do Servio de Informação Ao Cidadão - Protocolo No 00123000019201716, DOI: http://www.acessoainformacao.gov.br.

Sorkun, M.F. (2018), “How Do Social Norms Influence Recycling Behavior in a Collectivistic Society? A Case Study from Turkey”, Waste Management, 80, pp. 359-370, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.026.

Steentjes, K., T. Kurz, M. Barreto y T. A. Morton (2017), “The Norms Associated with Climate Change: Understanding Social Norms through Acts of Interpersonal Activism”, Global Environmental Change, 43, pp. 116-125, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloen¬vcha.2017.01.008.

Sugden, Robert (2009), “On Nudging: A Review of Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness”, de Richard H. Thaler y Cass R. Sunstein, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 16(3), pp. 365-373, DOI: 10.1080/13571510 903227064.

Sunstein, C.R. (2015), “Nudges, Agency, and Abstraction: A Reply to Critics”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), pp. 511-529, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164- 015-0266-z.

Sunstein, C.R. (2016), “Do People Like Nudges?”, Administrative Law Review, 68(2), pp. 177-232, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2604084.

Sunstein, C.R. y R. Thaler (2003), “Libertarian Paternalism”, American Economic Review, 93(2), pp. 175-179.

Sussman, A.B. y C.Y. Olivola (2011), “Axe the Tax: Taxes Are Disliked More than Equivalent Costs”, Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), S91-S101, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S91.

Thaler, R. y C. Sunstein (2009), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Londres, Penguin Books.

Tummers, L. (2019), “Public Policy and Behavior Change”, Public Administration Review, 79(6), pp. 925-930, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13109.

Yetano, A. y B.I. Castillejos (2019), “Performance Audit in Latin America: Improving Trust in Governments?”, Gestion y Política Pública, XXVIII(2), pp. 407-440, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v28i2.625.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-03
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    454
  • PDF (Español)
    280
  • XML (Español)
    5

How to Cite

Bevilacqua, Solon, and Edivan do Socorro Fonseca de Miranda. 2024. “Default in Paying Taxes: Intervention With Nudges and Social Standards”. Gestión Y Política Pública 33 (1):141-62. https://doi.org/10.60583/gypp.v33i1.8191.

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Posiciones e Ideas (Positions and Ideas).

Metrics